Advances in the Theory and Practice of Squid NDE

Date
1996
Authors
Cochran, A.
Donaldson, G.
Carr, C.
McKirdy, D.
Walker, M.
Klein, U.
Kuznik, J.
McNab, A.
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Altmetrics
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Department
Abstract

The superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) holds great promise for electromagnetic nondestructive evaluation (NDE) because it offers high sensitivity -permitting high lift-offs or very small excitation signals — and maintains this sensitivity from DC to high frequencies [1]. In eddy current NDE, this allows an induction coil to comprise only a few turns, or even a single filament, without a high permeability core, and makes forward modeling and inverse processing easier, since the induction source is well defined and the SQUID itself closely approximates an ideal sensor. However, the SQUID also has practical drawbacks, including the need for cryogenic temperatures and for differential configurations for measurements in environmental fields. Until very recently, almost all SQUID NDE systems were based on low temperature superconductors (LTSs), but the first measurements with high temperature superconductor (HTS) SQUIDs are now being reported [2–4].

Comments
Description
Keywords
Citation
DOI