Modeling Disruption in a Fresh Produce Supply Chain

Date
2016-01-01
Authors
MacKenzie, Cameron
MacKenzie, Cameron
Apte, Aruna
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Altmetrics
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Series
Department
Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering
Abstract

Purpose—The purpose of this paper is to quantify elements that make fresh produce supply chains vulnerable to disruptions and to quantify the benefits of different disruption management strategies.

Design/methodology/approach—This paper develops a mathematical model of a disruption in a fresh produce supply chain and analyzes the relationships among variables.

Findings—The model determines the optimal safety stock as a function of the perishability of the produce, the length of time it takes to find the contamination, the level of demand during the disruption, and the amount of produce that can be rerouted. Applying the model to the 2006 E. coli spinach contamination reveals that the drop in customer demand for fresh spinach plays the largest role in Dole losing sales.

Research limitations—The model includes several parameters that may be difficult to estimate. Future models can incorporate uncertainty that is inherent in supply chain disruptions.

Practical implications—The model in this paper can help a supply chain manager explore the trade-offs of different disruption management strategies. For example, a supply chain manager can determine the value of holding additional safety stock versus trying to improve traceability in the supply chain.

Originality/value—This paper quantifies and models insights delivered in the qualitative analyses of fresh produce supply chain disruptions. The theoretical contributions include an analysis of the interaction among safety stock, levels of demand, communication, and traceability parameters in order to help supply chain managers evaluate different strategies to mitigate the effects of contaminated produce.

Comments

This is the author’s accepted manuscript as published in International Journal of Logistics Management, 28(2), 656-679. Posted with permission.

Description
Keywords
Citation
DOI
Source
Collections