A method for quantifying individual decision thresholds of latent print examiners

Thumbnail Image
Date
2023-07-08
Authors
Luby, Amanda
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier B.V.
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Organizational Unit
Center for Statistics and Applications in Forensic Evidence
The Center for Statistics and Applications in Forensic Evidence (CSAFE) carries out research on the scientific foundations of forensic methods, develops novel statistical methods and transfers knowledge and technological innovations to the forensic science community. We collaborate with more than 80 researchers and across six universities to drive solutions to support our forensic community partners with accessible tools, open-source databases and educational opportunities.
Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Abstract
In recent years, ‘black box’ studies in forensic science have emerged as the preferred way to provide information about the overall validity of forensic disciplines in practice. These studies provide aggregated error rates over many examiners and comparisons, but errors are not equally likely on all comparisons. Furthermore, inconclusive responses are common and vary across examiners and comparisons, but do not fit neatly into the error rate framework. This work introduces Item Response Theory (IRT) and variants for the forensic setting to account for these two issues. In the IRT framework, participant proficiency and item difficulty are estimated directly from the responses, which accounts for the different subsets of items that participants often answer. By incorporating a decision-tree framework into the model, inconclusive responses are treated as a distinct cognitive process, which allows inter-examiner differences to be estimated directly. The IRT-based model achieves superior predictive performance over standard logistic regression techniques, produces item effects that are consistent with common sense and prior work, and demonstrates that most of the variability among fingerprint examiner decisions occurs at the latent print evaluation stage and as a result of differing tendencies to make inconclusive decisions.
Comments
This article is published as Luby, Amanda. "A method for quantifying individual decision thresholds of latent print examiners." Forensic Science International: Synergy 7 (2023): 100340. doi:10.1016/j.fsisyn.2023.100340. Posted with permission of CSAFE.

© 2023 The Author. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Description
Keywords
Citation
DOI
Copyright
Collections