Can Students Flourish in Engineering Classrooms?

dc.contributor.author Boylan-Ashraf, Peggy
dc.contributor.author Freeman, Steven
dc.contributor.author Keleş, Özgür
dc.contributor.author Shelley, Mack
dc.contributor.department Political Science
dc.contributor.department Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering (ENG)
dc.date 2018-02-18T21:23:53.000
dc.date.accessioned 2020-06-29T22:42:55Z
dc.date.available 2020-06-29T22:42:55Z
dc.date.copyright Sun Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2017
dc.date.issued 2017-01-01
dc.description.abstract <p>This study investigated the role of a new paradigm in teaching large introductory, fundamental engineering mechanics (IFEM) courses that combined student-centered learning pedagogies and supplemental learning resources. Demographic characteristics in this study included a total of 405 students, of whom 347 (85.7%) are males and 58 are (14.3%) females. The students’ majors included aerospace engineering, agricultural engineering, civil engineering, construction engineering, industrial engineering, materials engineering, and mechanical engineering. <br />Results of this study, as tested using an independent samples t-test, validated using a nonparametric independent samples test, and a general linear multivariate model analysis, indicated overwhelmingly that there is a difference between a class taught passively using the teacher-centered pedagogy and a class taught actively using student-centered pedagogy.<br />The principal focus of this work was to determine if the new paradigm was successful in improving student understanding of course concepts in statics of engineering using student-centered pedagogies in large classes. After evaluating the effects of several variables on students’ academic success, the results may provide important information for both faculty members and researchers and present a convincing argument to faculty members interested in academic reform but hesitant to abandon conventional teaching practices. By promoting a new paradigm, the potential for improving understanding of engineering fundamentals on a larger scale may be realized.</p>
dc.description.comments <p>This article is from Journal of STEM Education 18(1) (2017): 16–24. Posted with permission.</p>
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/abe_eng_pubs/821/
dc.identifier.articleid 2104
dc.identifier.contextkey 10621742
dc.identifier.s3bucket isulib-bepress-aws-west
dc.identifier.submissionpath abe_eng_pubs/821
dc.identifier.uri https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/1626
dc.language.iso en
dc.source.bitstream archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/abe_eng_pubs/821/2017_Freeman_CanStudents.pdf|||Sat Jan 15 02:08:22 UTC 2022
dc.subject.disciplines Agriculture
dc.subject.disciplines Bioresource and Agricultural Engineering
dc.subject.disciplines Engineering Education
dc.subject.keywords Engineering
dc.subject.keywords Active Learning
dc.title Can Students Flourish in Engineering Classrooms?
dc.type article
dc.type.genre article
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 15625c2e-f179-4b3f-a0ee-1cd6bf62d2bb
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 72aad68d-c748-4891-92f0-a5afc1643896
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication a4a018a7-4afa-4663-ba11-f2828cbd0a15
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 8eb24241-0d92-4baf-ae75-08f716d30801
File
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
2017_Freeman_CanStudents.pdf
Size:
1.87 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections