An analysis of the kinetics for oil agglomeration of coal

dc.contributor.advisor Thomas D. Wheelock
dc.contributor.author Tyson, David
dc.contributor.department Chemical and Biological Engineering
dc.date 2018-08-15T06:20:35.000
dc.date.accessioned 2020-07-02T06:16:23Z
dc.date.available 2020-07-02T06:16:23Z
dc.date.copyright Mon Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 1990
dc.date.issued 1990
dc.description.abstract <p>In batch tests with graphite, 2 min. were required to produce a maximum shift towards larger particle sizes in the distribution curves for a stirring speed of 21,000 rpm, slurry concentration of 2 wt%, and oil dosage of 10 v/w%. For a stirring speed of 650 rpm, 4 min. were required for the maximum shift. When the oil was pre-emulsified and then added to the slurry, the maximum shift required 1 min. at 650 rpm. In all these cases, the distribution curves showed particle size reductions after their maximum shift. In the case of 650 rpm, the shift was all the way back to nearly the feed size distribution;For emulsion characterization, the nonpolar oils (tetralin and a heptane/heptanol mixture) were more stable than the polar oil (heptane) and an ultrasonic treatment produced the most turbid emulsions;In batch studies with Australian coal from the Ulan mine, emulsification decreased the time needed for agglomeration and created slightly more compact spherical agglomerates. Although the use of heptane (a nonpolar oil) created more selective agglomeration of the organic matter, its use caused the agglomeration to proceed at a slower rate. Of the three oils used, heptane, tetralin, and the heptane/heptanol combination, the mixture of heptane/heptanol produced the fastest agglomeration;In continuous runs employing Upper Freeport coal, there were runs where the size of the agglomerates was limited to about 1000 [mu]m or smaller. In these runs, application of the layering mechanism in the population balance did a good job in modelling the particle growth. For runs where agglomeration produced particles that were much larger than 1000 [mu]m, the layering model was able to fit the size distribution for small particle sizes, while a Gaussian distribution was able to fit the distribution for large particle sizes. The Gaussian distribution was useful for two purposes: (1) for determining the influence of the operating parameters on the particle size distribution data, and (2) to serve as an explicit functional form when employing a coalescence/breakage model. Thus, some of the continuous runs produced distributions that were explained by assuming growth by layering, while other continuous runs produced distributions that were explained by both layering (small particle sizes) and coalescence/breakage (large particle sizes).</p>
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/9900/
dc.identifier.articleid 10899
dc.identifier.contextkey 6371599
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.31274/rtd-180813-12625
dc.identifier.s3bucket isulib-bepress-aws-west
dc.identifier.submissionpath rtd/9900
dc.identifier.uri https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/83050
dc.language.iso en
dc.source.bitstream archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/9900/r_9110573.pdf|||Sat Jan 15 02:39:27 UTC 2022
dc.subject.disciplines Chemical Engineering
dc.subject.disciplines Mining Engineering
dc.subject.keywords Chemical engineering
dc.title An analysis of the kinetics for oil agglomeration of coal
dc.type article
dc.type.genre dissertation
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 86545861-382c-4c15-8c52-eb8e9afe6b75
thesis.degree.level dissertation
thesis.degree.name Doctor of Philosophy
File
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
r_9110573.pdf
Size:
2.27 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: