Vegetative Treatment System Impacts on Groundwater Quality

dc.contributor.author Helmers, Matthew
dc.contributor.author Burns, Robert
dc.contributor.author Moody, Lara
dc.contributor.author Andersen, Daniel
dc.contributor.department Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering
dc.date 2018-02-14T11:24:27.000
dc.date.accessioned 2020-06-29T22:40:36Z
dc.date.available 2020-06-29T22:40:36Z
dc.date.copyright Wed Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2014
dc.date.embargo 2014-09-03
dc.date.issued 2014-01-01
dc.description.abstract <p>Increased environmental awareness has prompted the need for improved feedlot runoff control. Vegetative treatment systems (VTSs) provide a cost-effective option that may enhance environmental security by protecting water quality. Vegetative treatment systems are typically designed on the basis of hydraulic performance, which may result in excess application of some nutrients, specifically nitrogen and phosphorus. Groundwater quality monitoring is required to determine the effect, if any, that VTSs have on groundwater. Shallow groundwater (2 to 10 m) quality beneath six VTSs in Iowa was monitored over a four-year period. Monitoring wells were located upgradient, within, and downgradient of the VTSs. Groundwater samples were collected on a monthly basis and analyzed for ammoniacal nitrogen, chloride, nitrate-nitrogen, and fecal coliforms. A trend analysis was conducted to evaluate groundwater response patterns to VTS construction and use. In general, monitoring wells located within and downgradient of the VTS showed increasing trends in chloride and decreasing trends in nitrate concentrations. No trends for fecal coliforms or ammoniacal nitrogen were seen. Statistical analysis was performed to test for concentration differences between upgradient, within, and downgradient monitoring wells. In general, no differences in ammoniacal nitrogen concentration were seen. Fecal coliform concentrations were generally highest at the monitoring well within the VTS, but no difference was found between upgradient and downgradient concentrations. Chloride concentrations were generally significantly higher within and downgradient of the VTS when compared to the upgradient well; nitrate concentrations were generally significantly lower within and downgradient of the VTA than upgradient.</p>
dc.description.comments <p>This article is from <em>Transactions of the ASABE</em> 57 (2014): 417–430, doi:<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/trans.57.10231" target="_blank">10.13031/trans.57.10231</a>. Posted with permission.</p>
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/abe_eng_pubs/530/
dc.identifier.articleid 1805
dc.identifier.contextkey 6072579
dc.identifier.s3bucket isulib-bepress-aws-west
dc.identifier.submissionpath abe_eng_pubs/530
dc.identifier.uri https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/1307
dc.language.iso en
dc.source.bitstream archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/abe_eng_pubs/530/2014_Andersen_VegetativeTreatment.pdf|||Sat Jan 15 00:50:50 UTC 2022
dc.source.uri 10.13031/trans.57.10231
dc.subject.disciplines Agriculture
dc.subject.disciplines Bioresource and Agricultural Engineering
dc.subject.disciplines Water Resource Management
dc.subject.keywords Feedlot runoff
dc.subject.keywords Groundwater monitoring
dc.subject.keywords Groundwater quality
dc.subject.keywords Vegetative infiltration basins
dc.subject.keywords Vegetative treatment areas
dc.subject.keywords Vegetative treatment systems
dc.title Vegetative Treatment System Impacts on Groundwater Quality
dc.type article
dc.type.genre article
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 26a812e6-e6de-44ff-b7ea-d2459ae1903c
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 18329603-49c4-4007-985d-2402929993a8
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 8eb24241-0d92-4baf-ae75-08f716d30801
File
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
2014_Andersen_VegetativeTreatment.pdf
Size:
586.78 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections