Manure Incorporation Equipment Effects on Odor, Residue Cover, and Crop Yield

dc.contributor.author Hanna, H. Mark
dc.contributor.author Bundy, Dwaine
dc.contributor.author Mickelson, Steven
dc.contributor.author Lorimor, Jeffery
dc.contributor.author Melvin, Stewart
dc.contributor.author Erbach, Donald
dc.contributor.department Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering (ENG)
dc.date 2018-02-13T03:11:09.000
dc.date.accessioned 2020-06-29T22:36:03Z
dc.date.available 2020-06-29T22:36:03Z
dc.date.copyright Sat Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2000
dc.date.embargo 2012-11-16
dc.date.issued 2000-07-01
dc.description.abstract <p>Land application of manure may produce unacceptable odors. Field experiments in undisturbed (no-till) soybean and corn residue were conducted to evaluate six liquid swine manure application/incorporation methods. The methods were injection with a commercial (1) chisel or (2) sweep, (3) incorporation with tandem disk harrow after broadcast application, (4) broadcast application with no incorporation, (5) injection with a narrow-profile knife, and (6) surface application behind row cleaners. The row cleaner and all injection treatments used spoke-covering wheels. Air samples over the soil surface were obtained immediately following and one day after manure application, and odor level was measured by olfactometry (i.e., the amount of air dilutions to reach odor threshold). Residue cover and yield were also measured. Incorporation techniques typically reduced odor level by a factor of three to ten as compared with a broadcast application. One day after application, odor was greatly reduced and often indistinguishable from that of untreated soil (no manure application). Residue cover differences among application methods were more pronounced in soybean residue. Application by the narrow-profile knife, row cleaner, and chisel maintained soybean residue cover better than other incorporation methods yet limited odor similar to these methods. Although cover was reduced over winter, greater soybean residue cover remained after planting with fall than with spring manure applications. Differences in odor level and residue cover among methods were less in corn than soybean residue. All incorporation techniques reduced odor levels, and chisel incorporation maintained corn residue cover after planting similar to broadcast application. For both crops, broadcast application maintained the greatest residue cover but had the highest odor level. Incorporation of manure generally reduced odor, reduced residue cover, increased corn yield, and did not affect soybean yield.</p>
dc.description.comments <p>This article is from <a href="https://elibrary.asabe.org/abstract.asp?aid=5376&t=3&dabs=Y&redir=&redirType=" target="_blank"><em>Applied Engineering in Agriculture</em></a>, 16, no. 6 (2000): 621–627.</p> <p>This is Journal Paper No. J-18694 of the Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station, Ames, Iowa. Project 3263. Trade and company names are included in this article for the benefit of the reader and do not infer endorsement or preferential treatment of the product named by Iowa State University or the USDA Agricultural Research Service.</p>
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/abe_eng_pubs/1/
dc.identifier.articleid 1006
dc.identifier.contextkey 3474221
dc.identifier.s3bucket isulib-bepress-aws-west
dc.identifier.submissionpath abe_eng_pubs/1
dc.identifier.uri https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/694
dc.language.iso en
dc.source.bitstream archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/abe_eng_pubs/1/Mickelson_2000_ManureIncorporationEquipment.pdf|||Fri Jan 14 17:27:55 UTC 2022
dc.subject.disciplines Agriculture
dc.subject.disciplines Bioresource and Agricultural Engineering
dc.subject.keywords Application
dc.subject.keywords Applicators
dc.subject.keywords Manure spreaders
dc.subject.keywords Odors
dc.subject.keywords Crop residue
dc.subject.keywords Air quality
dc.subject.keywords Yields
dc.title Manure Incorporation Equipment Effects on Odor, Residue Cover, and Crop Yield
dc.type article
dc.type.genre article
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 732298de-2ea9-4502-8fcf-3418080016e1
relation.isAuthorOfPublication da46d2fe-a6a7-430e-bd46-3d57438b799f
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 8eb24241-0d92-4baf-ae75-08f716d30801
File
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Mickelson_2000_ManureIncorporationEquipment.pdf
Size:
679.87 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections