Choice Between Fluorescent and Poultry-Specific LED Lights by Pullets and Laying Hens Liu, Kai Xin, Hongwei Chai, Lilong Xin, Hongwei
dc.contributor.department Animal Science
dc.contributor.department Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering
dc.contributor.department Egg Industry Center 2018-05-10T05:10:27.000 2020-06-29T22:43:49Z 2020-06-29T22:43:49Z Sun Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2017 2017-01-01
dc.description.abstract <p>Light plays an important role in poultry development, production performance, health, and well-being. Light technology continues to advance, and accordingly new light products are finding applications in poultry operations. However, research concerning responses of young and adult laying hens to light sources is relatively lacking. This study assessed the choice between a Dim-to-Red poultry-specific light-emitting diode (LED) light (PS-LED, correlated color temperature or CCT = 2000K) and a warm-white fluorescent light (FL, CCT = 2700K) by pullets and laying hens (W-36 breed) via preference test. Birds with different prior lighting experiences were evaluated for their light choice, including (1) pullets (14 to 16 weeks of age or WOA) reared under incandescent light (designated as PINC), (2) layers (44 to 50 WOA) under PSLED (LLED) throughout the pullet and laying phases, and (3) layers under FL (LFL) throughout the pullet and laying phases. Each bird category consisted of 12 replicates, three birds per replicate. Each replicate involved a 6-day preference test, during which the birds could move freely between two interconnected compartments that contained PS-LED and FL, respectively. Time spent and feed intake by the birds under each light were measured and then analyzed with generalized linear mixed models. Results showed that regardless of prior lighting experience, birds in all cases showed stronger choice for FL (p = 0.001 to 0.030), as evidenced by higher proportions of time spent under it. Specifically, the proportion of time spent (mean ±SEM) under FL versus PS-LED was 58.0% ±2.9% vs. 42.0% ±2.9% for PINC, 53.7% ±1.6% vs. 46.3% ±1.6% for LLED, and 54.2% ±1.2% vs. 45.8% ±1.2% for LFL. However, the proportions of daily feed intake occurring under FL and PS-LED were comparable in all cases (p = 0.419 to 0.749). The study thus reveals that prior lighting experience of the pullets or layers did not affect their choice of FL versus PS-LED. While the birds exhibited a somewhat stronger choice for FL, this tendency did not translate into differences in the proportion of feed use under each light type.</p>
dc.description.comments <p>This article is published as Liu, Kai, Hongwei Xin, and Lilong Chai. "Choice Between Fluorescent and Poultry-Specific LED Lights by Pullets and Laying Hens." <em>Transactions of the ASABE</em> 60, no. 6 (2017): 2185-2195. DOI: <a href="" target="_blank">10.13031/trans.12402</a>. Posted with permission.</p>
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier archive/
dc.identifier.articleid 2217
dc.identifier.contextkey 12076479
dc.identifier.s3bucket isulib-bepress-aws-west
dc.identifier.submissionpath abe_eng_pubs/934
dc.language.iso en
dc.source.bitstream archive/|||Sat Jan 15 02:31:47 UTC 2022
dc.source.uri 10.13031/trans.12402
dc.subject.disciplines Agriculture
dc.subject.disciplines Animal Sciences
dc.subject.disciplines Bioresource and Agricultural Engineering
dc.subject.disciplines Poultry or Avian Science
dc.subject.keywords Behavior and welfare
dc.subject.keywords Computer vision
dc.subject.keywords Poultry Lighting
dc.subject.keywords Preference assessment
dc.title Choice Between Fluorescent and Poultry-Specific LED Lights by Pullets and Laying Hens
dc.type article
dc.type.genre article
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 36e0a8ce-fa2e-4df4-9f67-8d1717122650
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 85ecce08-311a-441b-9c4d-ee2a3569506f
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 8eb24241-0d92-4baf-ae75-08f716d30801
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
1.33 MB
Adobe Portable Document Format