RIN Pass-Through at Gasoline Terminals

dc.contributor.author Pouliot, Sebastien
dc.contributor.author Smith, Aaron
dc.contributor.author Stock, James
dc.contributor.department Department of Economics (LAS)
dc.date 2019-07-18T06:43:26.000
dc.date.accessioned 2020-06-30T02:14:18Z
dc.date.available 2020-06-30T02:14:18Z
dc.date.embargo 2018-08-09
dc.date.issued 2017-02-22
dc.description.abstract <p>Wholesale suppliers at fuel terminals blend gasoline with ethanol to create finished gasoline. Under the US Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS), this blending activity produces a renewable fuel credit, known as a RIN, which blenders can sell to oil refiners who need it for RFS compliance. We estimate whether these suppliers, known as rack sellers, pass through the value of RINS. Based on a population-weighted regression with 20 large cities, we estimate a 63% RIN pass through for branded fuel (95% confidence interval [0.23, 1.03]) and a 92% pass through for unbranded fuel (95% CI [0.70, 1.14]). The confidence intervals on the pooled national regressions are wide and include full pass-through. When we estimate pass-through in regions, we find that suppliers pass through the RIN value in the Midwest – the so-called ethanol belt – and in the Gulf states. The estimates for the Midwest are 0.86 (branded, 95% CI [0.63, 1.09]) and 0.99 (unbranded, 95% CI [0.83, 1.16]). The estimates for the Gulf region are 0.88 (branded, 95% CI [0.74, 1.02]) and 0.89 (branded, 95% CI [0.76, 1.02]). In contrast, we find incomplete passthrough in Eastern cities, with estimates of 0.38 (branded, 95% CI [0.13, 0.63]) and 0.50 (unbranded, 95% CI [0.14, 0.85]); for the East, these confidence intervals do not include one. Price spreads in the West are too volatile to estimate RIN pass through precisely in that region. We also find that passthrough of RIN values to E10 prices is complete at terminals that offer multiple blends, but is incomplete (especially for branded fuels) at terminals that offer neither pure ethanol nor higher blends. The incomplete pass-through we find is a sign of too little competition at some terminals and in some regions, and that incomplete pass-through reduces the efficiency of the RIN program.</p>
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/econ_workingpapers/50/
dc.identifier.articleid 1049
dc.identifier.contextkey 12629221
dc.identifier.s3bucket isulib-bepress-aws-west
dc.identifier.submissionpath econ_workingpapers/50
dc.identifier.uri https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/22672
dc.relation.ispartofseries 17038
dc.source.bitstream archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/econ_workingpapers/50/2017_Pouliot_RINPassWP.pdf|||Sat Jan 15 00:41:21 UTC 2022
dc.subject.disciplines Agricultural and Resource Economics
dc.subject.disciplines Behavioral Economics
dc.subject.disciplines Growth and Development
dc.subject.disciplines Oil, Gas, and Energy
dc.subject.disciplines Regional Economics
dc.title RIN Pass-Through at Gasoline Terminals
dc.type working paper
dc.type.genre working paper
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication dfd58297-8c5c-46d1-bda3-a3b3ba574b03
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 4c5aa914-a84a-4951-ab5f-3f60f4b65b3d
File
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
2017_Pouliot_RINPassWP.pdf
Size:
2.09 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections