Feasibility of Bedded Hoop Barns for Market Beef Cattle in Iowa: Cattle Performance, Bedding Use, and Environment

dc.contributor.author Honeyman, Mark
dc.contributor.author Harmon, Jay
dc.contributor.author Harmon, Jay
dc.contributor.author Shouse, Shawn
dc.contributor.author Busby, W.
dc.contributor.author Maxwell, Dallas
dc.contributor.department Animal Science
dc.contributor.department Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering
dc.date 2018-02-13T03:55:07.000
dc.date.accessioned 2020-06-29T22:43:37Z
dc.date.available 2020-06-29T22:43:37Z
dc.date.copyright Tue Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2008
dc.date.embargo 2012-12-10
dc.date.issued 2008-01-01
dc.description.abstract <p>The objective was to document a bedded hoop barn for feeding market beef cattle. A comparison between a bedded hoop barn (15.2 × 36.6 m) and an open-front feedlot building (11.0 × 61.0 m) was conducted in southwest Iowa. The hoop barn was oriented north-south on a ridge with no windbreak. In summer, temperature was relatively consistent between the structures and ambient conditions, although the north end of the hoop barn had a slightly elevated dew point temperature. A summer temperature-humidity index showed that the hoop barn had fewer hours in "alert" category than either open front or ambient conditions. In winter, a cold stress index showed that the open-front barn provided the most shelter for the cattle with 92% of the hours classified as "no impact," compared with the hoop barn at 77% and ambient at 51%. Both ends of the hoop barn were open, except for piled big round bales for a windbreak during winter. Growth, feed-to-gain, and dry matter intake for the cattle were similar between housing systems. Quality and yield grades were similar. Mud scores may be less for cattle from the bedded hoop barn compared with the open-front feedlot where mud was possible. Labor usage was similar for the hoop barn and the open-front feedlot. Labor occurred throughout the feeding period for the hoop barn because manure cleaning occurred weekly. Bedded hoop barns offer a viable alternative for feeding beef cattle and may reduce feedlot runoff.</p>
dc.description.comments <p>This article is from <em><a href="http://elibrary.asabe.org/abstract.asp?aid=24265&t=3&dabs=Y&redir=&redirType=" target="_blank">Applied Engineering in Agriculture</a></em> 24, no. 2 (2008): 251–256.</p>
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/abe_eng_pubs/91/
dc.identifier.articleid 1091
dc.identifier.contextkey 3526163
dc.identifier.s3bucket isulib-bepress-aws-west
dc.identifier.submissionpath abe_eng_pubs/91
dc.identifier.uri https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/1724
dc.language.iso en
dc.source.bitstream archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/abe_eng_pubs/91/Harmon_2008_FeasibilityBeddedHoop.pdf|||Sat Jan 15 02:27:59 UTC 2022
dc.subject.disciplines Agriculture
dc.subject.disciplines Animal Sciences
dc.subject.disciplines Bioresource and Agricultural Engineering
dc.subject.keywords Beef cattle housing
dc.subject.keywords Bedding
dc.subject.keywords Feedlots
dc.subject.keywords Deep bedded housing
dc.title Feasibility of Bedded Hoop Barns for Market Beef Cattle in Iowa: Cattle Performance, Bedding Use, and Environment
dc.type article
dc.type.genre article
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 863ffed7-5274-46d6-95cc-47c7d0d5b6ab
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 85ecce08-311a-441b-9c4d-ee2a3569506f
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 8eb24241-0d92-4baf-ae75-08f716d30801
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
557 KB
Adobe Portable Document Format