A cluster-randomized trial comparing two SWITCH implementation support strategies for school wellness intervention effectiveness

File

2021-GS Alert Pub-VazouS-A cluster-randomized trial comparing two SWITCH.pdf (2.05 MB)

Date

2021-12-03

Authors

Rosenkranz, Richard R.
Dzewaltowski, David A.
McLoughlin, Gabriella M.
Lee, Joey A.
Lanningham-Foster, Lorraine M.
Gentile, Doug A.
Welk, Gregory J

Publisher

2021 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Shanghai University of Sport

Altmetrics

Organizational Units

Food Science and Human Nutrition

Organizational Unit

Psychology

Organizational Unit

Statistics

Organizational Unit

Department

Food Science and Human NutritionPsychologyStatistics

Abstract

Background: The School Wellness Integration Targeting Child Health (SWITCH) intervention has demonstrated feasibility as an implementation approach to help schools facilitate changes in students' physical activity (PA), sedentary screen time (SST), and dietary intake (DI). This study evaluated the comparative effectiveness of enhanced (individualized) implementation and standard (group-based) implementation. Methods: Iowa elementary schools (n = 22) participated, each receiving standardized training (wellness conference and webinars). Schools were matched within region and randomized to receive either individualized or group implementation support. The PA, SST, and DI outcomes of 1097 students were assessed at pre- and post-intervention periods using the Youth Activity Profile (YAP). Linear mixed models evaluated differential change in outcomes by condition, for comparative effectiveness, and by gender. Results: Both implementation conditions led to significant improvements in PA and SST over time (p < 0.01), but DI did not improve commensurately (p = 0.02‒0.05). There were no differential changes between the group and individualized conditions for PA (p = 0.51), SST (p = 0.19), or DI (p = 0.73). There were no differential effects by gender (i.e., non-significant condition-by-gender interactions) for PA (pfor interaction = 0.86), SST (pfor interaction = 0.46), or DI (pfor interaction = 0.15). Effect sizes for both conditions equated to approximately 6 min more PA per day and approximately 3 min less sedentary time. Conclusion: The observed lack of difference in outcomes suggests that group implementation of SWITCH is equally effective as individualized implementation for building capacity in school wellness programming. Similarly, the lack of interaction by gender suggests that SWITCH can be beneficial for both boys and girls. Additional research is needed to understand the school-level factors that influence implementation (and outcomes) of SWITCH.

Comments

This article is published as Rosenkranz RR, Dixon PM, Dzewaltowski DA, McLoughlin GM, Lee JA, Chen S, Vazou S, Lanningham-Foster LM, Gentile DA, Welk GJ. A cluster-randomized trial comparing two SWITCH implementation support strategies for school wellness intervention effectiveness. J Sport Health Sci. 2021 Dec 3:S2095-2546(21)00138-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2021.12.001. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34871789.

Keywords

Children, Implementation science, Obesity prevention, Physical activity, School health