Study strategies and beliefs about learning as a function of academic achievement and achievement goals

Thumbnail Image
Date
2018-01-01
Authors
Geller, Jason
Toftness, Alexander
Armstrong, Patrick
Carpenter, Shana
Manz, Carly
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract

Prior research by Hartwig and Dunlosky [(2012). Study strategies of college students: Are self-testing and scheduling related to achievement? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(1), 126–134] has demonstrated that beliefs about learning and study strategies endorsed by students are related to academic achievement: higher performing students tend to choose more effective study strategies and are more aware of the benefits of self-testing. We examined whether students’ achievement goals, independent of academic achievement, predicted beliefs about learning and endorsement of study strategies. We administered Hartwig and Dunlosky’s survey, along with the Achievement Goals Questionnaire [Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 80, 501–519] to a large undergraduate biology course. Similar to results by Hartwig and Dunlosky, we found that high-performing students (relative to low-performing students) were more likely to endorse self-testing, less likely to cram, and more likely to plan a study schedule ahead of time. Independent of achievement, however, achievement goals were stronger predictors of certain study behaviours. In particular, avoidance goals (e.g., fear of failure) coincided with increased use of cramming and the tendency to be driven by impending deadlines. Results suggest that individual differences in student achievement, as well as the underlying reasons for achievement, are important predictors of students’ approaches to studying.

Series Number
Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Type
article
Comments

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Memory in 2018, available online at DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2017.1397175. Posted with permission.

Rights Statement
Copyright
Sun Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2017
Funding
DOI
Supplemental Resources
Collections