What Is It Worth? The Economic Value of Manure Testing

Thumbnail Image
Date
2014-01-01
Authors
Regan, Kelsey
Andersen, Daniel
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Organizational Unit
Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering

Since 1905, the Department of Agricultural Engineering, now the Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering (ABE), has been a leader in providing engineering solutions to agricultural problems in the United States and the world. The department’s original mission was to mechanize agriculture. That mission has evolved to encompass a global view of the entire food production system–the wise management of natural resources in the production, processing, storage, handling, and use of food fiber and other biological products.

History
In 1905 Agricultural Engineering was recognized as a subdivision of the Department of Agronomy, and in 1907 it was recognized as a unique department. It was renamed the Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering in 1990. The department merged with the Department of Industrial Education and Technology in 2004.

Dates of Existence
1905–present

Historical Names

  • Department of Agricultural Engineering (1907–1990)

Related Units

Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Department
Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering
Abstract

Animal manure is a valuable fertilizer for crop production, but effective utilization requires knowledge of the manure’s nutrient content. This warrants that the manure be sampled and tested to make informed management decisions. However, there has been low adoption of annual manure testing (ca. 20% of farms). Presumably, this is because farmers view the costs and efforts of testing to be greater than the benefits. To evaluate the monetary value of manure testing, a model was developed. Using published literature values of manure nutrient concentrations and other agronomic factors as inputs, this model assesses how production expenses and incomes change with knowledge of manure’s nutrient content. The model suggests that when applying manure at a nitrogen-limited rate, sampling manure before application increases profits by $20 to $68 ha-1, and sampling during application increases profits by $3 to $50 ha-1. When applying manure at a phosphorus-limited rate, profits increase by $4 to $22 ha-1 when samples are analyzed either before or during application. These results illustrate that manure testing is economically beneficial and indicate that when application is nitrogen limited, manure should be sampled prior to application. If applying manure at a phosphorus-limited rate, sampling during application is recommended.

Comments

This article is from Transactions of the ASABE 57 (2014): 1845–1852, doi:10.13031/trans.57.10864.

Description
Keywords
Citation
DOI
Copyright
Wed Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2014
Collections