Cognitive dissonance as a means of reducing hypothetical bias

Date
2010-01-01
Authors
Alfnes, Frode
Yue, Chengyan
Jensen, Helen
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Altmetrics
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Economics
Organizational Unit
Journal Issue
Series
Department
EconomicsCenter for Agricultural and Rural Development
Abstract

Hypothetical bias is a persistent problem in stated preference studies. We propose and test a method for reducing hypothetical bias based on the cognitive dissonance literature in social psychology. A central element of this literature is that people prefer not to take inconsistent stands and will change their attitudes and behaviour to make them consistent. We find that participants in a stated preference willingness-to-pay study, when told that a nonhypothetical study of similar goods would follow, state significantly lower willingness to pay (WTP) than participants not so informed. In other words, participants adjust their stated WTP to avoid cognitive dissonance, that is, taking inconsistent stands on their WTP for the good being offered.

Comments

This is a working paper of an article from European Review of Agricultural Economics 37 (2010): 147, doi: 10.1093/erae/jbq012.

Description
Keywords
Citation
DOI
Collections