Evaluation of individual and ensemble probabilistic forecasts of COVID-19 mortality in the United States

Date
2022-04-08
Authors
Cramer, Estee
Lopez, Velma
Niemi, Jarad
Niemi, Jarad
George, Glover
Cegan, Jeffrey
Dettwiller, Ian
England, William
Farthing, Matthew
Hunter, Robert
Lafferty, Brandon
Linkov, Igor
Mayo, Michael
Parno, Matthew
Rowland, Michael
Trump, Benjamin
Wang, Lily
Gao, Lei
Gu, Zhiling
Kim, Myungjin
Wang, Yueying
Walker, Jo
Slayton, Rachel
Johansson, Michael
Biggerstaff, Matthew
et al.
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Altmetrics
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Finance
Organizational Unit
Statistics
Organizational Unit
Journal Issue
Series
Department
FinanceStatistics
Abstract
Short-term probabilistic forecasts of the trajectory of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States have served as a visible and important communication channel between the scientific modeling community and both the general public and decision-makers. Forecasting models provide specific, quantitative, and evaluable predictions that inform short-term decisions such as healthcare staffing needs, school closures, and allocation of medical supplies. Starting in April 2020, the US COVID-19 Forecast Hub (https://covid19forecasthub.org/) collected, disseminated, and synthesized tens of millions of specific predictions from more than 90 different academic, industry, and independent research groups. A multimodel ensemble forecast that combined predictions from dozens of groups every week provided the most consistently accurate probabilistic forecasts of incident deaths due to COVID-19 at the state and national level from April 2020 through October 2021. The performance of 27 individual models that submitted complete forecasts of COVID-19 deaths consistently throughout this year showed high variability in forecast skill across time, geospatial units, and forecast horizons. Two-thirds of the models evaluated showed better accuracy than a naïve baseline model. Forecast accuracy degraded as models made predictions further into the future, with probabilistic error at a 20-wk horizon three to five times larger than when predicting at a 1-wk horizon. This project underscores the role that collaboration and active coordination between governmental public-health agencies, academic modeling teams, and industry partners can play in developing modern modeling capabilities to support local, state, and federal response to outbreaks.
Comments
This article is published as Cramer, Estee Y., Evan L. Ray, Velma K. Lopez, Johannes Bracher, Andrea Brennen, Alvaro J. Castro Rivadeneira, Aaron Gerding et al. "Evaluation of individual and ensemble probabilistic forecasts of COVID-19 mortality in the United States." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119, no. 15 (2022): e2113561119. doi:10.1073/pnas.2113561119. Works produced by employees of the U.S. Government as part of their official duties are not copyrighted within the U.S. The content of this document is not copyrighted.
Description
Keywords
Citation
DOI
Collections