South Dakota Amendment E Ruled Unconstitutional - Is There a Future for Legislative Involvement in Shaping the Structure of Agriculture?

Date
2003-09-05
Authors
McEowen, Roger
Harl, Neil
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Source URI
Altmetrics
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Series
Abstract

In South Dakota Farm Bureau, Inc. et. al. v. Hazeltine, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit upheld the Federal District Court for the District of South Dakota and ruled the South Dakota anti-corporate farming law unconstitutional on “dormant commerce clause” grounds. The opinion is viewed as critical to the future viability of anti-corporate farming restrictions in other states and, more generally, to the ability of state legislatures to shape the structure of agriculture within their borders.

Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections