Utilitarianism versus the Repugnant Conclusion
Date
2023-02-23
Authors
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Copyright 2023, The Author
Research Projects
Journal Issue
Series
23001
Department
Abstract
An influential body of literature has challenged the suitability of utilitarianism as a criterion for population ethics. Parfit's (1984) Repugnant Conclusion posits that utilitarianism favors the existence of large, impoverished societies. Dasgupta's (2005, 2019) calibrated models provide support for this conclusion. However, this paper demonstrates that these findings can be overturned by considering alternative, plausible assumptions. For instance, a wealthy society with a small population can be consistent with utilitarianism. The paper argues that utilitarianism offers a reliable benchmark for population ethics.
Comments
JEL Codes: J13 J17 D6; Length: 20 pages; Original Release date: February 23, 2023.