Performance of Farm-Type Moisture Meters

dc.contributor.author Bern, Carl
dc.contributor.author Paynter, Lynn
dc.contributor.author Hurburgh, Charles
dc.contributor.author Schmitt, Steven
dc.contributor.department Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering (ENG)
dc.date 2018-02-13T15:53:14.000
dc.date.accessioned 2020-06-29T22:39:43Z
dc.date.available 2020-06-29T22:39:43Z
dc.date.copyright Wed Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 1986
dc.date.embargo 2013-10-16
dc.date.issued 1986
dc.description.abstract <p>Three farm-type moisture meters (Dickey-john DJMC, Dole 400-B, and Electrex DMT-2)* were compared to USDA-approved oven methods on 225 corn samples (10.4% - 33.8% moisturet) and 96 soybean samples (8.0% - 16.6% moisture) from the 1984 crop. In corn, the DJMC read ±0.5 percentage point of the oven up to 27% moisture. The 400-B read ±0.5 percentage point of the oven up to 28% moisture. The DMT-2 read equivalent to the oven at 11% moisture, but read progressively lower than the oven as moisture increased. At 25% corn moisture, DMT-2 read 4.4 percentage points less than the oven. In soybeans, DJMC tested a relatively constant 0.52 percentage points higher than the oven, 400-B read ±0.25 points, and DMT-2 varied linearly from 1.2 points high at 10% moisture to 1.5 point low at 17% moisture. Calibration correction equations are given for all three meters. Variability (with respect to the oven) of the farm-type meters increased as corn moisture increased, with an average coefficient of variation (CV) of 4.2%. Three trade-type meters, included for reference purposes, had an average CV of 2.4% on the same samples. In soybeans, variability was not a function of moisture content; the farm and trade meters had standard deviations relative to the oven of 0.37 and 0.26 points respectively. The major share of variability originated from sample-to-sample variations in electrical properties, followed by differences among individual units of the same brand then variations among replicate meter tests and oven tests on a sample.</p>
dc.description.comments <p>This article is from <em>Transactions of the ASAE</em> 29 (1986): 1118–1123. Posted with permissino.</p>
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/abe_eng_pubs/423/
dc.identifier.articleid 1700
dc.identifier.contextkey 4728487
dc.identifier.s3bucket isulib-bepress-aws-west
dc.identifier.submissionpath abe_eng_pubs/423
dc.identifier.uri https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/1188
dc.language.iso en
dc.source.bitstream archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/abe_eng_pubs/423/1986_HurburghCR_PerformanceFarmTypeMoisture.pdf|||Sat Jan 15 00:13:25 UTC 2022
dc.subject.disciplines Agriculture
dc.subject.disciplines Bioresource and Agricultural Engineering
dc.title Performance of Farm-Type Moisture Meters
dc.type article
dc.type.genre article
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication cbd58252-88a0-4555-b546-3613f558583e
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 0544d4c0-b52e-42fa-8419-df2d08ad526b
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 8eb24241-0d92-4baf-ae75-08f716d30801
File
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
1986_HurburghCR_PerformanceFarmTypeMoisture.pdf
Size:
1.46 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections