Differences in adhesion and protrusion properties correlate with differences in migration speed under EGF stimulation

dc.contributor.author Hou, Yue
dc.contributor.author Hedberg, Sarah
dc.contributor.author Schneider, Ian
dc.contributor.department Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering
dc.date 2018-02-15T21:39:11.000
dc.date.accessioned 2020-06-30T01:08:33Z
dc.date.available 2020-06-30T01:08:33Z
dc.date.copyright Sun Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2012
dc.date.embargo 2015-03-03
dc.date.issued 2012-01-01
dc.description.abstract <p>Background: Cell migration plays an essential role in many biological processes, such as cancer metastasis, wound healing and immune response. Cell migration is mediated through protrusion and focal adhesion (FA) assembly, maturation and disassembly. Epidermal growth factor (EGF) is known to enhance migration rate in many cell types; however it is not known how FA maturation, FA dynamics and protrusion dynamics are regulated during EGF-induced migration. Here we use total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy and image analysis to quantify FA properties and protrusion dynamics under different doses of EGF stimulation.Results: EGF was found to broaden the distribution of cell migration rates, generating more fast and slow cells. Furthermore, groups based on EGF stimulation condition or cell migration speed were marked by characteristic signatures. When data was binned based on EGF stimulation conditions, FA intensity and FA number per cell showed the largest difference among stimulation groups. FA intensity decreased with increasing EGF concentration and FA number per cell was highest under intermediate stimulation conditions. No difference in protrusion behavior was observed. However, when data was binned based on cell migration speed, FA intensity and not FA number per cell showed the largest difference among groups. FA intensity was lower for fast migrating cells. Additionally, waves of protrusion tended to correlate with fast migrating cells.Conclusions: Only a portion of the FA properties and protrusion dynamics that correlate with migration speed, correlate with EGF stimulation condition. Those that do not correlate with EGF stimulation condition constitute the most sensitive output for identifying why cells respond differently to EGF. The idea that EGF can both increase and decrease the migration speed of individual cells in a population has particular relevance to cancer metastasis where the microenvironment can select subpopulations based on some adhesion and protrusion characteristics, leading to a more invasive phenotype as would be seen if all cells responded like an " average" cell.</p>
dc.description.comments <p>This is an article from BMC Biophysics 5 (2012): article number 8, doi: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-1682-5-8" target="_blank">10.1186/2046-1682-5-8</a>. Posted with permission.</p>
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/cbe_pubs/218/
dc.identifier.articleid 1217
dc.identifier.contextkey 6766549
dc.identifier.s3bucket isulib-bepress-aws-west
dc.identifier.submissionpath cbe_pubs/218
dc.identifier.uri https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/13311
dc.language.iso en
dc.source.bitstream archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/cbe_pubs/218/2012_SchneiderIC_DifferencesAdhesionProtrusion.pdf|||Fri Jan 14 22:39:02 UTC 2022
dc.source.uri 10.1186/2046-1682-5-8
dc.subject.disciplines Biochemical and Biomolecular Engineering
dc.subject.disciplines Chemical Engineering
dc.subject.disciplines Genetics and Genomics
dc.subject.keywords Genetics
dc.subject.keywords development and cell biology
dc.subject.keywords biochemical engineering
dc.title Differences in adhesion and protrusion properties correlate with differences in migration speed under EGF stimulation
dc.type article
dc.type.genre article
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 22eb24b7-a47b-44a4-bcf4-c83dd9d6b825
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 86545861-382c-4c15-8c52-eb8e9afe6b75
File
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
2012_SchneiderIC_DifferencesAdhesionProtrusion.pdf
Size:
2.65 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections