Editorial: Historical perspectives and future needs in soil mapping, classification, and pedologic modeling

Date
2016-02-15
Authors
Brevik, Eric
Miller, Bradley
Baumgarten, Andreas
Calzolari, Costanza
Jordán, Antonio
Kabala, Cezary
Miller, Bradley
Pereira, Paulo
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Altmetrics
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Agronomy
Organizational Unit
Journal Issue
Series
Department
Agronomy
Abstract

Soil mapping, classification, and modelling have been important drivers in the advancement of our understanding of soil from the earliest days of the scientific study of soils. Soil maps were desirable for purposes of land valuation for taxation, agronomic planning (Brevik and Hartemink, 2010; Miller and Schaetzl, 2014), and in military operations (Lark, 2008; Brevik et al., 2015a). Soil mapping required classification systems that would allow accurate and succinct communication of mapped information (Brevik and Hartemink, 2013), classification systems required understanding of the soil system (Marbut, 1922), and gaining that understanding included the creation of soil models (Wilding, 1994). Therefore, advancement in one of these highly interrelated areas tended to lead to corresponding advances in the others, and these relationships persist into the modern era. Furthermore, studying our field’s history allows us to understand how we arrived at our current theories, including better understanding of both the strengths and weaknesses of those theories. Within this special issue (SI), historical aspects of soil mapping, classification, and/or pedogenic models are emphasized in papers by Brevik et al. (2015b), Calzolari and Filippi (2015), Miller and Schaetzl (2015), and Minasny and McBratney (2015).

Comments

This is a manuscript of an editorial published as Brevik, E.C., A. Baumgarten, C. Calzolari, A. Jordán, C. Kabala, B.A. Miller, and P. Pereira. Editorial: Historical perspectives and future needs in soil mapping, classification, and pedologic modeling. Geoderma 264:253-255. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.09.022. Posted with permission.

Description
Keywords
Citation
DOI
Collections