Ammonia, Greenhouse Gas, and Particulate Matter Emissions of Aviary Layer Houses in the Midwestern U.S.

Date
2013-01-01
Authors
Hayes, Morgan
Xin, Hongwei
Xin, Hongwei
Li, Hong
Shepherd, Timothy
Zhao, Yang
Stinn, John
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Altmetrics
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Series
Department
Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering
Abstract

There has been an increased interest in alternative housing for laying hens in certain parts of the world, including the U.S. Associated with the movement are many questions concerning sustainability of such systems. This study continually quantified concentrations and emissions of ammonia (NH3), carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), and particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) for two side-by-side aviary barns each housing 50,000 Hy-Line brown laying hens, located in the Midwestern U.S. The gaseous concentrations were continually monitored using an infrared photoacoustic multi-gas analyzer, while the PM concentrations were measured with tapered element oscillating microbalances (TEOMs). Barn ventilation rate was determined by monitoring the operation time of ventilation fans that had been calibrated in situ. Nineteen consecutive months of monitored data (June 2010 to December 2011) are analyzed and presented. Daily indoor aerial concentrations (mean ±SD) were 8.7 (±8.4) ppm NH3, 1,636 (±1,022) ppm CO2, 10.0 (±6.8) ppm CH4, 2.3 (±1.6) mg m-3 PM10, and 0.25 (±0.26) mg m-3 PM2.5. The aerial emissions are expressed as quantities per hen, per animal unit (AU, 500 kg body weight), and per kg egg output. Daily emission rates (g bird-1) were 0.15 (±0.08) NH3, 75 (±15) CO2, 0.09 (±0.08) CH4, 0.11 (±0.04) PM10, and 0.008 (±0.006) PM2.5. The results were compared to reported emission values for conventional (high-rise and manure-belt cage) U.S. laying-hen housing systems. Data from this study provide baseline concentration and emission values for the aviary housing system in the Midwestern U.S., which will also contribute to improvement of the U.S. national air emissions inventory for farm animal operations.

Comments

This article is from Transactions of the ASABE 56 (2013): 1921–1932, doi:10.13031/trans.56.10053. Posted with permission.

Description
Keywords
Citation
DOI
Collections