Spatial Heterogeneity Across Five Rangelands Managed with Pyric-Herbivory

dc.contributor.author McGranahan, Devan
dc.contributor.author Engle, David
dc.contributor.author Fuhlendorf, Samuel
dc.contributor.author Winter, Steven
dc.contributor.author Debinski, Diane
dc.contributor.department Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology (CALS)
dc.date 2018-02-17T04:53:26.000
dc.date.accessioned 2020-06-30T02:16:23Z
dc.date.available 2020-06-30T02:16:23Z
dc.date.copyright Sun Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2012
dc.date.issued 2012-08-01
dc.description.abstract <p><strong>1.</strong> Many rangelands evolved under an interactive disturbance regime in which grazers respond to the spatial pattern of fire and create a patchy, heterogeneous landscape. Spatially heterogeneous fire and grazing create heterogeneity in vegetation structure at the landscape level (patch contrast) and increase rangeland biodiversity. We analysed five experiments comparing spatially heterogeneous fire treatments to spatially homogeneous fire treatments on grazed rangeland along a precipitation gradient in the North American Great Plains. <strong>2.</strong> We predicted that, across the precipitation gradient, management for heterogeneity increases both patch contrast and variance in the composition of plant functional groups. Furthermore, we predicted that patch contrast is positively correlated with variance in plant functional group composition. Because fire spread is important to the fire–grazing interaction, we discuss factors that reduce fire spread and reduce patch contrast despite management for heterogeneity. <strong>3.</strong> We compared patch contrast across pastures managed for heterogeneity and pastures managed for homogeneity with a linear mixed effect (LME) regression model. We used the LME model to partition variation in vegetation structure to each sampled scale so that a higher proportion of variation at the patch scale among pastures managed for heterogeneity indicates patch contrast. To examine the relationship between vegetation structure and plant community composition, we used constrained ordination to measure variation in functional group composition along the vegetation structure gradient. We used the meta-analytical statistic, Cohen’s d, to compare effect sizes for patch contrast and plant functional group composition. <strong>4.</strong> Management for heterogeneity increased patch contrast and increased the range of plant functional group composition at three of the five experimental locations. <strong>5.</strong> Plant functional group composition varied in proportion to the amount of spatial heterogeneity in vegetation structure on pastures managed for heterogeneity. <strong>6.</strong> <em>Synthesis and applications</em>. Pyric-herbivory management for heterogeneity created patch contrast in vegetation across a broad range of precipitation and plant community types, provided that fire was the primary driver of grazer site selection. Management for heterogeneity did not universally create patch contrast. Stocking rate and invasive plant species are key regulators of heterogeneity, as they determine the influence of fire on the spatial pattern of fuel, vegetation structure and herbivore patch selection, and therefore also require careful management.</p>
dc.description.comments <p>This is a manuscript of an article in <em>Journal of Applied Ecology</em> 49 (2012): 903, doi:<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02168.x" target="_blank">10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02168.x</a>. Posted with permisison.</p>
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/eeob_ag_pubs/107/
dc.identifier.articleid 1108
dc.identifier.contextkey 7801547
dc.identifier.s3bucket isulib-bepress-aws-west
dc.identifier.submissionpath eeob_ag_pubs/107
dc.identifier.uri https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/22968
dc.language.iso en
dc.source.bitstream archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/eeob_ag_pubs/107/2012_Debinksi_SpatialHeterogeneity.pdf|||Fri Jan 14 18:26:19 UTC 2022
dc.source.uri 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02168.x
dc.subject.disciplines Biodiversity
dc.subject.disciplines Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
dc.subject.disciplines Natural Resources and Conservation
dc.subject.disciplines Plant Biology
dc.subject.keywords biodiversity conservation
dc.subject.keywords fire–grazing interaction
dc.subject.keywords grazing management
dc.subject.keywords heterogeneity
dc.subject.keywords patch contrast
dc.subject.keywords pyric-herbivory
dc.subject.keywords working landscapes
dc.title Spatial Heterogeneity Across Five Rangelands Managed with Pyric-Herbivory
dc.type article
dc.type.genre article
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication aecfd42d-9301-436f-bbe4-440275050da7
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 6fa4d3a0-d4c9-4940-945f-9e5923aed691
File
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
2012_Debinksi_SpatialHeterogeneity.pdf
Size:
198.3 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections