Hog Price and Volume Comparisons across Alternative Sale Types, Emphasis on COVID-19 Disruptions

dc.contributor.author Butcher, Ezra
dc.contributor.author Schulz, Lee
dc.contributor.department Center for Agricultural and Rural Development
dc.contributor.department Economics
dc.date.accessioned 2022-02-21T14:43:12Z
dc.date.available 2022-02-21T14:43:12Z
dc.date.issued 2021-09
dc.description.abstract In 2020, due to COVID-19, swine and pork markets in the United States experienced the worst disruption since 1998. We seek to inform discussions about marketing outcomes and possible structural changes by establishing performance baselines and providing definitions and descriptions for transactions between producers and packers. From 2010–2020, prices were highest in 2014 and lowest in 2020. We estimate simple models to see how changes in pork packing plant capacity utilization impact market hog prices by sale type. Results indicate that negotiated prices are the most sensitive to increases in utilization, decreasing 2.34% for every 1% increase in utilization. Negotiated sales volume has become incredibly thin, comprising only 1.52% of all hogs reported in 2020, compared with 14.65% back in 2002. There is a need, on occasion, to modify how data is published which directly contributes to the effectiveness of Livestock Mandatory Reporting (LMR). For example, other purchase arrangement sales increased in volume in 2016 as hogs raised without ractopamine or antibiotics were reclassified from swine or pork market formula sales. Sales based on the CME Lean Hog Index or Pork Cutout Index have been reclassified as swine or pork market formula sales. The correlation of pork carcass cutout values and negotiated hog prices has deteriorated from 0.919 in 2013 to 0.255 in 2020. Separating swine or pork market formula sales into swine formula sales and pork formula sales could improve price correlations. Summaries of price distributions provide a snapshot of marketing outcomes and aid in bringing further transparency to the marketplace.
dc.identifier.uri https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/Yr3K2j5r
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher © Author(s) 2021
dc.relation.ispartofseries 21-PB 36
dc.subject.disciplines DegreeDisciplines::Life Sciences::Agriculture
dc.subject.disciplines DegreeDisciplines::Business::Operations and Supply Chain Management
dc.subject.disciplines DegreeDisciplines::Business::Agribusiness
dc.title Hog Price and Volume Comparisons across Alternative Sale Types, Emphasis on COVID-19 Disruptions
dc.type Other
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 80843e31-c6f0-4f24-9fad-e3d179df190d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 80843e31-c6f0-4f24-9fad-e3d179df190d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 1a6be5f1-4f64-4e48-bb66-03bbcc25c76d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 4c5aa914-a84a-4951-ab5f-3f60f4b65b3d
File
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
2021-Schulz-HogPriceCARDPB.pdf
Size:
892.27 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections