Absence of bactericidal effect of focused shock waves on an in-vitro biofilm model of an implant

dc.contributor.author Madron, Matthew
dc.contributor.author McClure, Scott
dc.contributor.author Griffith, Ronald
dc.contributor.author Wang, Chong
dc.contributor.department Veterinary Clinical Sciences
dc.contributor.department Statistics (LAS)
dc.contributor.department Veterinary Microbiology and Preventive Medicine
dc.contributor.department Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine
dc.date 2018-02-17T17:52:54.000
dc.date.accessioned 2020-07-07T05:13:35Z
dc.date.available 2020-07-07T05:13:35Z
dc.date.copyright Sun Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2012
dc.date.issued 2012-04-01
dc.description.abstract <p>The objective of this study was to evaluate the bactericidal effect of shock waves (SWs) on gram-negative or gram-positive monocultured biofilms grown on an orthopedic implant in vitro. Cortical bone screws were individually cultured with <em>Escherichia coli</em> or <em>Staphylococcus epidermidis</em> to produce a biofilm. In each run of 8 screws, 6 screws were treated with shock waves and then sonicated to disrupt the biofilm. One screw was sonicated only and one was not shock waved or sonicated before sampling for plate count dilutions. Post-treatment serial dilutions and plate counts were done on an aliquot from the vial containing each screw to obtain the number of colony-forming units (CFUs). Shock waves were at a constant energy of 0.15 mJ/mm2. Pulse number and screw orientation were varied. A linear mixed-effects model was used with “treatment” as a fixed effect and “run” as a random effect. Pairwise comparisons of treatments were performed with Tukey-Cramer’s adjustment for <em>P</em>-values. Sonicated plate counts were greater than nonsonicated counts for each run. When all sonicated screws were compared to all nonsonicated screws, the counts were significantly increased (<em>P</em> = 0.0091). For each paired comparison between sonicated and shock wave treatment, the only significant difference was in the <em>S. epidermidis</em> biofilm treated at 2000 pulses in a horizontal position, which increased the post-treatment count (<em>P</em> = 0.0445). No bactericidal effects were seen on monocultured biofilms on cortical bone screws treated with shock waves.</p>
dc.description.comments <p>This article is from <em>The Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research </em>76 (2012): 129. Posted with permission.</p>
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/vdpam_pubs/69/
dc.identifier.articleid 1069
dc.identifier.contextkey 8721252
dc.identifier.s3bucket isulib-bepress-aws-west
dc.identifier.submissionpath vdpam_pubs/69
dc.identifier.uri https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/92097
dc.language.iso en
dc.source.bitstream archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/vdpam_pubs/69/0-Canadian_Journal_of_Veterinary_Research_permission.pdf|||Sat Jan 15 01:30:22 UTC 2022
dc.source.bitstream archive/lib.dr.iastate.edu/vdpam_pubs/69/2012_Wang_AbsenceBactericidal.pdf|||Sat Jan 15 01:30:23 UTC 2022
dc.subject.disciplines Statistical Methodology
dc.subject.disciplines Veterinary Infectious Diseases
dc.subject.disciplines Veterinary Microbiology and Immunobiology
dc.subject.disciplines Veterinary Preventive Medicine, Epidemiology, and Public Health
dc.title Absence of bactericidal effect of focused shock waves on an in-vitro biofilm model of an implant
dc.type article
dc.type.genre article
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication b715071c-c3bd-419c-b021-0ac4702f346a
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 1ad68def-86ae-460b-8808-f1b1febafd0a
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 264904d9-9e66-4169-8e11-034e537ddbca
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 16f8e472-b1cd-4d8f-b016-09e96dbc4d83
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 5ab07352-4171-4f53-bbd7-ac5d616f7aa8
File
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
2012_Wang_AbsenceBactericidal.pdf
Size:
962.7 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
0-Canadian_Journal_of_Veterinary_Research_permission.pdf
Size:
141.1 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections