Expanding the classical paradigm: what we have learnt from vertebrates about sex chromosome evolution

dc.contributor.author Kratochvíl, Lukáš
dc.contributor.author Stöck, Matthias
dc.contributor.author Rovatsos, Michail
dc.contributor.author Bullejos, Mónica
dc.contributor.author Herpin, Amaury
dc.contributor.author Jeffries, Daniel L.
dc.contributor.author Peichel, Catherine L.
dc.contributor.author Perrin, Nicolas
dc.contributor.author Valenzuela, Nicole
dc.contributor.author Pokorná, Martina Johnson
dc.contributor.department Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology (LAS)
dc.date.accessioned 2022-04-04T14:19:48Z
dc.date.available 2022-04-04T14:19:48Z
dc.date.issued 2021-07-26
dc.description.abstract Until recently, the field of sex chromosome evolution has been dominated by the canonical unidirectional scenario, first developed by Muller in 1918. This model postulates that sex chromosomes emerge from autosomes by acquiring a sex-determining locus. Recombination reduction then expands outwards from this locus, to maintain its linkage with sexually antagonistic/advantageous alleles, resulting in Y or W degeneration and potentially culminating in their disappearance. Based mostly on empirical vertebrate research, we challenge and expand each conceptual step of this canonical model and present observations by numerous experts in two parts of a theme issue of Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. We suggest that greater theoretical and empirical insights into the events at the origins of sex-determining genes (rewiring of the gonadal differentiation networks), and a better understanding of the evolutionary forces responsible for recombination suppression are required. Among others, crucial questions are: Why do sex chromosome differentiation rates and the evolution of gene dose regulatory mechanisms between male versus female heterogametic systems not follow earlier theory? Why do several lineages not have sex chromosomes? And: What are the consequences of the presence of (differentiated) sex chromosomes for individual fitness, evolvability, hybridization and diversification? We conclude that the classical scenario appears too reductionistic. Instead of being unidirectional, we show that sex chromosome evolution is more complex than previously anticipated and principally forms networks, interconnected to potentially endless outcomes with restarts, deletions and additions of new genomic material. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Challenging the paradigm in sex chromosome evolution: empirical and theoretical insights with a focus on vertebrates (Part II)’.
dc.description.comments This article is published as Kratochvíl L et al. 2021 Expanding the classical paradigm: what we have learnt from vertebrates about sex chromosome evolution. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 376: 20200097. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0097. © 2021 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
dc.identifier.uri https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/EzR2BPDz
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Royal Society
dc.source.uri https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0097 *
dc.subject.keywords evolution
dc.subject.keywords sex chromosomes
dc.subject.keywords sex determination
dc.subject.keywords vertebrates
dc.title Expanding the classical paradigm: what we have learnt from vertebrates about sex chromosome evolution
dc.type article
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication cc984ec0-a821-45f2-895d-e5fd76250b94
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication fb57c4c9-fba7-493f-a416-7091a6ecedf1
File
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
2021-Valenzuela-ExpandingClassical.pdf
Size:
577.37 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections