Conservation plans and soil and water conservation practice use: Evidence from Iowa

dc.contributor.author Morris, Chris
dc.contributor.author Arbuckle, J. Gordon
dc.contributor.department Department of Sociology and Criminal Justice (LAS)
dc.date.accessioned 2025-03-12T13:09:55Z
dc.date.available 2025-03-12T13:09:55Z
dc.date.issued 2021-09-01
dc.description.abstract Conservation planning is the primary tool the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) uses to help farmers manage and protect the nation’s soil, water, air, plant, animal, energy, and human natural resources on privately owned lands. While research studies have investigated a multitude of factors that could possibly influence farmer adoption of conservation practices, no recent research exists examining the relationship between having an NRCS conservation plan and the likelihood of applying conservation practices on the ground. This is surprising given that conservation planning is considered to be the foundation for USDA’s technical and financial assistance to agricultural landowners, and recently both the updated NRCS Strategic Plan and the National Conservation Planning Partnership emphasized the need to enhance and expand conservation planning. In this study we analyzed data from 792 respondents of the 2015 and 2016 collection periods of a panel survey of Iowa farmers to examine the relationship between having an NRCS conservation plan and farmers’ implementation of 10 soil and water conservation practices in four categories: (1) soil health, (2) nitrogen (N) management, (3) structural practices, and (4) cropland converted to perennial crops. The results indicate that farmers who reported having an NRCS conservation plan are significantly more likely to have implemented two conservation practices: no-till and terraces. In addition, there was a significant relationship between the number of times a farmer visited a USDA Service Center for conservation and the likelihood they implemented 5 of the 10 selected practices, particularly in the soil health and structural practice categories. These results suggest that it is not the plan itself, but rather the sustained interaction with natural resource professionals, that makes a difference in the use of conservation practices. Implications of the study results for NRCS conservation planning moving forward in the future are discussed.
dc.description.comments This article is published as Morris, Chris, and J. Gordon Arbuckle. "Conservation plans and soil and water conservation practice use: Evidence from Iowa." Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 76, no. 5 (2021): 457-471. doi:10.2489/jswc.2021.00166.
dc.identifier.uri https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/dvmqlYbv
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Soil and Water Conservation Society
dc.rights © 2021 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society. Posted with permission.
dc.source.uri https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.2021.00166 *
dc.subject.disciplines DegreeDisciplines::Social and Behavioral Sciences::Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration::Environmental Policy
dc.subject.disciplines DegreeDisciplines::Social and Behavioral Sciences::Sociology::Rural Sociology
dc.subject.keywords conservation plans
dc.subject.keywords conservation practice adoption
dc.subject.keywords Iowa
dc.subject.keywords Natural Resources Conservation Service
dc.title Conservation plans and soil and water conservation practice use: Evidence from Iowa
dc.type article
dc.type.genre article
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 74cafb20-bc7c-4324-9e2d-2bc9f4f4a029
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 84d83d09-42ff-424d-80f2-a35244368443
File
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
2021-Arbuckle-ConservationPlans.pdf
Size:
308.24 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
SWCS Permission.pdf
Size:
157.67 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections