A Comparison of the Ability of Phase-Insensitive and Phase-Sensitive Ultrasonic Receivers to Detect Material Abnormalities Beneath Rough Surfaces

Date
1998
Authors
Hollman, K.
Trousil, R.
Holland, M.
Miller, J.
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Altmetrics
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Department
Abstract

Phase cancellation effects can occur if irregularities in a specimen distort the ultrasonic phase fronts presented to a spatially extended piezoelectric receiving transducer. Among other causes, surface roughness can contribute to wavefront distortion [1] which, in turn, leads to phase cancellation at a piezoelectric receiving transducer. To minimize this problem specimens are often limited to materials that can be prepared with smooth surfaces. Ideally, the nature of the nondestructive evaluation of materials implies that the specimens should not have to be altered merely for the sake of examination. Specifically, actions such as grinding rough surfaces only to improve the quality of the inspection are contrary to the spirit of nondestructive evaluation. Previous studies have shown that phaseinsensitive detection reduces the effects of phase cancellation [2–5]. Therefore phaseinsensitive detection should be less significantly influenced than phase-sensitive detection by the presence of rough surfaces that may commonly arise from specimen production.

Comments
Description
Keywords
Citation
DOI