Ultrasonic Inversion: A Direct and an Indirect Method

Thumbnail Image
Date
1987
Authors
Chaloner, C.
Bond, Leonard
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Authors
Person
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Series
Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation
Center for Nondestructive Evaluation

Begun in 1973, the Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (QNDE) is the premier international NDE meeting designed to provide an interface between research and early engineering through the presentation of current ideas and results focused on facilitating a rapid transfer to engineering development.

This site provides free, public access to papers presented at the annual QNDE conference between 1983 and 1999, and abstracts for papers presented at the conference since 2001.

Department
Abstract

A formal yet widely applicable definition of inversion is difficult to find; this has led to Flax et al [l] to comment ‘Inverse scattering means many things to many people’. However, the inverse problem, viewed with particular reference to defect characterisation, can be regarded as gaining information on the features of an unknown or concealed body which can be made to cause a disturbance in an interrogating field. Thus imaging can be classed a non parametric inversion and indeed imaging and inversion processes have been shown to be mathematically equivalent under certain conditions [2]. Solutions to an inverse problem can be divided into two groups: direct and indirect. The direct method involves mathematical operations (usually transforms) for which the experimental data are the input and the interpretation of those data is the output. Indirect inversion, on the other hand, means finding the best fit between experimental data and a previously assumed theoretical model, and is usually an iterative process.

Comments
Description
Keywords
Citation
DOI
Copyright
Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 1987