Liquid swine manure as a phosphorus source for corn-soybean rotation

Thumbnail Image
Date
2004-01-01
Authors
Barbazán, Mónica
Major Professor
Advisor
Antonio P. Mallarino
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Altmetrics
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Organizational Unit
Agronomy

The Department of Agronomy seeks to teach the study of the farm-field, its crops, and its science and management. It originally consisted of three sub-departments to do this: Soils, Farm-Crops, and Agricultural Engineering (which became its own department in 1907). Today, the department teaches crop sciences and breeding, soil sciences, meteorology, agroecology, and biotechnology.

History
The Department of Agronomy was formed in 1902. From 1917 to 1935 it was known as the Department of Farm Crops and Soils.

Dates of Existence
1902–present

Historical Names

  • Department of Farm Crops and Soils (1917–1935)

Related Units

Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Department
Abstract

Improving management guidelines may result in more efficient use of liquid swine manure and in reduced environmental risks. Two different studies were conducted on farmers' fields using liquid swine manure on corn and soybean crops. One study used conventional research plot methodology with objectives to evaluate (a) manure P effects on early plant growth, early P plant uptake, grain yield, and P removal with grain; (b) crop response to fertilizer P applied in addition to manure P applied once for two crops; and (c) evaluate liquid swine manure P application on soil P measured with three routine soil-P tests (Bray-1 P, Olsen, and Mehlich 3 P), and two environmental tests (Iron-oxide and Water extraction). The second study used a strip-trial methodology using precision agriculture technologies and its objective was to compare three statistical methods (classical, geostatistic, and Markov random field model) to study soil-test P spatial variability after applying liquid swine manure with variable- (VR) and fixed- (FR) rate application methods. Early growth and P uptake were not directly related to manure or fertilizer P application. Grain yield responsive sites tested less <20 mg P kg-1, except for one site. Fertilizer P did not increase grain yield at any site when applied in addition to the high manure rate. Manure or fertilizer P increased soil test P (STP) in many sites, and soil tests did not differ consistently in detecting an STP increase due to manure and fertilizer P. Differences between both P sources in increasing STP were not evident when similar rates of P were compared. Routine and environmental P tests did not differ in assessing available P from liquid swine manure or fertilized soils. The results demonstrated that liquid swine manure is a valuable resource of P for crop production and provided no evidence for lower season-long availability of P in manure compared with P in fertilizer. The VR manure application method reduced STP variability, probably because more P was applied to low-testing field areas and less or no P was applied to high-testing areas. Conclusions were similar for the three statistical methods used.

Comments
Description
Keywords
Citation
Source
Copyright
Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2004