Effects of Facility Design on the Stress Response of Market Weight Pigs during Loading and Unloading

Thumbnail Image
Date
2009-01-01
Authors
Sadler, Larry
Garvey, Jill
Uhlenkamp, Tony
Faga, Michael
Feuerbach, Corky
Hill, Howard
Bailey, Ryan
Ritter, Matthew
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Altmetrics
Authors
Person
Johnson, Anna
Professor Animal Behavior and Welfare
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Department
Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the effects of finisher pig facility design on pig stress responses at the time of loading for the market weight pig. The new (NEW) design had 192 pigs / pen with internal swing gates that were used to manually pre-sort market weight pigs on the day before loading. Traditional (TRAD) design had 32 pigs / pen; it was not feasible to pre-sort market weight pigs prior to loading. During loading, treatments were alternatively assigned to trailer decks. Pigs were loaded onto straight deck trailers, provided with ~0.41 m 2 / pig and were transported ~1 h to a commercial plant. During loading and unloading, the number of pigs displaying open mouth breathing (OMB), skin discoloration (SD) and muscle tremors (MT) were recorded. At the plant, dead and nonambulatory pigs were recorded during unloading, and nonambulatory pigs were classified as fatigued (stress-related) or injured. Total losses were defined as the sum of dead + non-ambulatory pigs at the plant. Data were analyzed by Proc Glimmix of SAS. NEW pigs had lower (P ≤ 0.05) percentages of OMB, SD and MT during loading and unloading compared to TRAD pigs. NEW pigs had fewer (P < 0.05) dead pigs (0.01 vs. 0.23 ± 0.05 %), total nonambulatory pigs (0.29 vs. 0.66 ± 0.12 %) and total losses (0.30 vs. 0.89 ± 0.14 %) at the plant compared to TRAD pigs. In summary, utilizing large pens and pre-sorting prior to loading, reduced physical signs of stress during loading and unloading, and reduced total losses at the plant by 66 % compared to pigs from traditional pens.

Comments
Description
Keywords
Citation
Source
Keywords
Copyright
Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2009
Collections