Supreme Court Clarifies Ability of Farmers to Sue Pesticide Manufacturers

Thumbnail Image
Date
2005-05-20
Authors
McEowen, Roger
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Organizational Unit
Iowa State University Digital Repository
The Iowa State University Digital Repository is the open access institutional repository for the university to collect, manage, share, and preserve free, worldwide access to research and scholarship of Iowa State faculty, staff, and students. Material in the Digital Repository covers a wide range of disciplines from engineering to social sciences to arts and humanities.
Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Department
Iowa State University Digital Repository
Abstract

There are several situations that a farmer may face that will limit the farmer’s ability to sue a manufacturer on a product liability claim.1 One of these involves damages arising from the use of registered pesticides. The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act,2 limits the ability of injured parties to sue pesticide manufacturers on either an inadequate labeling or wrongful death claim basis. A significant question has been whether state law damage claims for pesticide-related agricultural crop injury are pre-empted by FIFRA and whether FIFRA pre-emption of damage claims is limited to the specific subjects that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reviews at the time it first approves a pesticide product’s labeling. The recent opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court in Bates, et al. v. Dow Agrosciences LLC3 provides important guidance on how courts are to analyze FIFRA preemption claims in the future.

Comments
Description
Keywords
Citation
DOI
Source
Copyright
Collections