Does image editing improve the quality of latent prints? An analysis of image-editing techniques in one crime laboratory

Thumbnail Image
Date
2023-01
Authors
Gardner, Brett O.
Neuman, Maddisen
Kelley, Sharon
Hong, Anni
Mejia, Robin
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
© 2022 The Chartered Society of Forensic Sciences
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Department
Center for Statistics and Applications in Forensic Evidence
Abstract
Field research within latent print comparison has remained sparse in the context of an otherwise growing body of literature examining the discipline. Studies examining how ACE-V procedures are implemented within active crime laboratories are especially lacking in light of research suggesting significant variability in examiner practices despite standardized ACE-V procedures. To date, no studies have examined a potentially important aspect of the Analysis phase: digital image editing. We provide information on the prevalence and types of latent print image editing within one laboratory (i.e., Houston Forensic Science Center), examine the potential effect of image editing on objective print quality and clarity (i.e., LQMetrics scores), and explore potential examiner differences in editing effectiveness. Results indicate that most latent prints are edited in some manner, and that image editing improves the quality and clarity of print images as defined by an objective quality metric, although examiners varied in their ability to improve the clarity of print images. Findings suggest that formal guidance or documentation of standard editing procedures would likely improve the reliability of examiner conclusions early in the latent print comparison process.
Comments
This is a manuscript of an article published as Gardner, Brett O., Maddisen Neuman, Sharon Kelley, Anni Hong, and Robin Mejia. "Does image editing improve the quality of latent prints? An analysis of image-editing techniques in one crime laboratory." Science & Justice 63, no. 1 (2023): 109-115. doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2022.11.006. Posted with permission of CSAFE.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Description
Keywords
Citation
DOI
Copyright
Collections