Evaluation of the Onset of Protective Immunity from Administration of a Modified-live, Non-adjuvanted Vaccine prior to Intranasal Challenge with Bovine Herpesvirus-1

Thumbnail Image
Date
2011-04-01
Authors
Burdett, William
Bolton, Michael
Kesl, Lyle
Nordstrom, Scott
Renter, David
Saltzman, Ryan
Xue, Wenzhi
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Research Projects
Journal Issue
Series
Abstract

Study objectives were to determine if subcutaneous administration of a modified-live, non-adjuvanted vaccine containing bovine herpesvirus-1 (BHV-1) at five, three, or two days pre-challenge, would reduce clinical signs, rectal temperatures, and viral shedding, and enhance serological response to BHV-1. Colostrumdeprived, neonatal calves (n = 48) were randomly assigned to six treatment groups, each containing eight calves. Treatment groups were based on administration of vaccine (VAC) or saline controls (CON) and day of administration (day -5, -3 or -2) relative to intranasal BHV-1 challenge (day 0). Following challenge, calves were monitored for clinical signs, rectal temperature, seroconversion, and quantity of BHV-1 recovered by virus isolation from nasal swabs. Data for the evaluation period (days 4-14) were analyzed using multivariable statistics. Day -5 and -3 VAC groups had fewer (P < 0.05) days of clinical illness compared to CON. Rectal temperatures were lower (P < 0.05) during days 4-8 for each of the VAC groups as compared to combined CON groups. CON calves shed BHV-1 for more days than calves vaccinated on day -5 (P < 0.01), day -3 (P = 0.06), or day -2 (P = 0.06). Mean concentrations of nasal BHV-1 also differed (P < 0.05) between combined CON groups and each of the VAC groups during at least one study day. Calves in the VAC groups (median = 10 days) seroconverted to BHV-1 (P < 0.01) sooner than CON calves (median = 14 days). This study demonstrated that the use of a non-adjuvanted MLV vaccine in neonatal calves can reduce the effects of BHV-1 challenge soon after vaccination.

Comments

This article is from The Bovine Practitioner 45 (2011): 32. Posted with permission.

Description
Keywords
Citation
DOI
Source
Copyright
Sat Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2011
Collections